21
May
13

Promised Land

Promised_Land_(2012)

While certainly agitpop, I enjoyed Promised Land starring Matt Damon, John Krasinski, Frances McDormand, and Hal Halbrooke. It’s the story of a newly promoted natural gas employee whose job is to get family farmers to sign over their land rights. Then Global Oil will begin fracking, which can go terribly wrong, contaminating the land and water for generations. Of course, Damon’s character leaves that bit out of his sales pitch. He and McDormand visit a small town in Pennsylvania promising these good folks that they can make loads of cash and threatening them that this is their last and only chance at a good life for their kids.

Damon’s character, Steve Butler, comes from a small town in Iowa that’s hit economic hard times since a Catapillar plant left town, probably for China or some place with cheap, cheap labor. Steve keeps assuring himself that he’s a good guy and his conscience starts to flare when Krasinski’s environmental advocate comes to town. The two compete and time and again Steve’s luck and charm run out.

The story has some twists at the end and reminded me of a modern version of Upton Sinclair’s Oil! – which we all should read. It’s a palatable way to learn about fracking and corporate practice. There’s a B story with a love triangle, but that subplot isn’t as strong as it could be.

All in all, I’d give this a thumbs up.

13
May
13

Silver Linings Playbook

JENNIFER LAWRENCE and BRADLEY COOPER star in SILVER LININGS PLAYBOOK

While I enjoyed Silver Lining Playbook, the story of Pat, a bipolar man released from a mental institution, who’s intensely committed to getting his wife back. I wouldn’t watch it twice. It’s good, but not that good.

Robert De Niro, Bradley Cooper, Jennifer Lawrence and the rest of the cast all turn in fine performances and the story pulls one along. I was just too aware of the plot points and screenwriting conventions to be blown away. I found the energy between characters, particularly Pat’s father (De Niro), Pat (Cooper) and Tiffany (Lawrence), entertaining, though I was aware that I was suspending disbelief while I watched. I guess I just don’t spend much time with people who’re so compulsive.

Midway through the story Pat Sr., who’s very superstitious, bets a fortune on a big game. Throughout the film the characters’ reverence for football is played out and I suppose some people’s lives do revolve around these hobbies in this fashion. I didn’t mind watching their rituals, but sometimes I felt manipulated. For example, Pat goes to a football game and sees his Indian shrink alight from a stereotypical bus that you’d see in New Delhi with Hindu gods painted on it. Never in a million years would this professional take that bus with all his Indian friends to a game. They might drive in sedans, but that wouldn’t serve the plot. Of course, some red necks bully the minorities and Pat gets into the fray after trying really hard not to. Will he be sent back to the mental hospital? That worry is worked throughout the film.

I think and hope we’re in the midst of a change in story paradigms so the conventions are more noticeable, and for me, disappointing. Adding a bet to a plot is so simplistic, such a cop out, as is abnormal psychology in characterization. I know bipolar people and they aren’t like Pat or Tiffany. Now those folks mainly take their meds, but not always. Also, there seems to be a disproportionate number of mentally ill characters on screens, big and small, in the U.S. now. Writers seem fascinated with them and I think they’re easier to write than other characters. I admit Tiffany’s personality, while abrasive to the nth degree was compelling, but the idea that a relationship with her as she is is a good idea for anyone was hard to buy. Lawrence got the Oscar for her performance, but the Academy falls for these sorts of characters a lot. While a crazy chick is a compelling character, I don’t think the performance ranks as best of the year, unless 2012 was a slow year for female roles.

I saw Silver Lining Playbook because my friend Michele recommended it strongly. It was a fine movie, but not a must see. I’m glad I didn’t spend $10 on a ticket.

12
May
13

Monsieur Lazhar

Quiet, thoughtful, and touching, Monsieur Lazhar tells the story of a substitute teacher from Algeria who takes over a grade school class whose teacher committed suicide. The title character came to Montreal as a refugee and his immigration status is precarious.

I soon got pulled into this film in a way that’s rare when I watch a Hollywood film. It’s less predictable or high octane. The characters seemed very real, especially the children whose dialog was authentic. Too often child actors are given absurd lines only someone over 30 would come up with.

Monsieur Lazhar reminded me of The Class, a.k.a.Entre les Murs, another film set in a school, which was well worth watching.

08
May
13

Cultural Differences

For my English 3 class we begin each class with a YouKu video that a student’s chosen. They explain what the video is and why they like it. Today we had one that’s longer than usual, that all the students really liked, though it made me uncomfortable.

Stand up comedian Russell Peters jokes about how white people should hit their kids. While it’s original, I guess, I just didn’t find it funny. I thought it was troubling in so many ways. I’ve always been greatly opposed to corporal punishment and am well versed in it’s negative effects. Still in much of the world it’s common.

At the end of the set, he talks about how rude, angry and rebellious American white kids are. That rang true and I am still wondering why. Why do we accept rebellion and why is it so severe, when other cultures don’t express it?

07
May
13

From My Students

Here are a few short films and YouKu discoveries my students have shared recently.

from Spain

from Pixar

 

29
Apr
13

Parts Unknown

anthony b

Anthony Bourdain seems to be everywhere, not just everywhere in the world but everywhere on TV. He’s the center of ABC’s The Taste, the Travel Channel, PBS’ Mind of a Chef and now CNN’s Parts Unknown. The series premiered with Bourdain heading to Myanmar, a country I’ve wanted to visit for years and years, but couldn’t as I didn’t want to support that military.

Bagan, Myanmar

Bagan, Myanmar

In episode 1, Bourdain travels to Myanmar, a.k.a. Burma. As you’d expect he meets up with interesting folk over enticing food. Many of his interview subjects had been imprisoned when the military was keeping tighter constraints and they openly discussed politics, their experiences and their expectations for the future.

After a few days in the capital, Bourdain and his mentor take a clunky slow train to Bagan. The town of Bagan looked so inviting and untouched. Yet the train ride seemed so risky. Perhaps when/if I visit Myanmar, I’ll skip the trains, though air travel isn’t much safer.

The episode was fascinating and Bourdain’s insights were wry and wise.

The series is off to a good start, though I’m not sure I’d spend the time on the second episode, which is L.A. Yeah, L.A. has its bizarro pockets and its elegance and diversity, but who doesn’t know that? I watch travel shows to discover places I can’t easily get to myself.

22
Apr
13

The Chicago 8

Chicago-8-poster-470x285

The Chicago 8 dramatizes the infamous trial of Bobby Seale, Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, David Dellinger, Tom Hayden, Lee Weiner, Rennie Davis and John Froines, who were accused of violating anti-riot laws and conspiracy in connection with the 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago. The film shows Judge Julius Hoffman’s bias and the defendant’s defiance as is reported in the court transcripts. It’s a film of a chapter of American history of great import as it shows how derailed our justice system can get.

In an article about a play on the trial that the Remains Theater was doing in 1997, the event was summarized as follows:

It went down something like this.

By the summer of 1968, Chicago had been rocked by wide-scale rioting on the city’s West Side after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Mayor Richard J. Daley had issued his infamous “Shoot to kill” arsonists order during that time and he publicly vowed that when the national convention of his beloved Democratic party came to Chicago in August, “outside agitators” would not be allowed to disrupt his city again.

Sen. Robert Kennedy was murdered several weeks before the convention, anti-war protests had continued unabated even though incumbent President Lyndon Johnson had announced he would not seek re-election and his vice president, Hubert Humphrey, marched toward the Democratic convention as his likely successor.

When the convention convened in a heavily guarded International Amphitheater on the Southwest Side, thousands of young demonstrators gathered in Lincoln and Grant Parks, engaging in five nights of violent clashes with Chicago police.

Early in 1969, after months of finger-pointing and blame, eight of those demonstrators, representing a cross-section of the anti-war movement in the country, were charged with conspiring to come to Chicago to stage riots and with rioting. It was the first major use of a new federal anti-conspiracy law that was decried as an unconstitutional violation of Freedom of Speech.

By September 1969, the stage was set for a replay of the Democratic convention, this time in an austere courtroom on the 23rd floor of the Dirksen Federal Building at 219 N. Dearborn St. and presided over by crusty Federal Judge Julius J. Hoffman. (Davis, 1997)

The film captures the feeling of the five month long trial, though it leaves out parts that would have been good like “folk singer Judy Collins having her mouth covered by the hands of a federal marshal as she tried to sing, “Where have all the flowers gone?” in an impromptu concert during her testimony . . . .and Beat poet Allen Ginsberg chanting a mantra-”ommmm, ommmm”-while on the witness stand in a humorous attempt to restore tranquility when the court broke out in one of its frequent bursts of shouting” (Davis, 1997).

We forget how fragile our justice system is and how one judge can contort it to his own ends.  The movie starts a little slow and includes some footage of an orgie that just doesn’t belong as there’s no follow up, but the second and third act are more tightly put together and the historical event should be understood by all.

References

Davis, R. (1991, Sep 15). Return of the Chicago 7: the trial was great theater, but will it work on stage? Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from search.proquest.com on April 22, 2013

N.B. Since Bobbie Seale was removed from this trial, in a very racist manner, some call it the Chicago 7 and others the Chicago 8.




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 150 other followers

%d bloggers like this: